Western Systemic Human Zoo Farms and Their Ritual Exhibitions: Elections as Instruments of Domestication, Enslavement, and Colonization of Slaves

Anti-Democratic Multi-Party Dictatorships and the Hollow Promise of Human Rights for Subjugated Slaves

By Direct Democratic Communist Confederation 

The European small human zoos may be relics of the past, yet the legacy of colonial systemic human zoo farms persists globally, masquerading as democracy and freedom rituals. These inherited systems, with their regular exhibitions known as elections, serve to deceive and exploit populations, treating them as mere laborers. This concept of human farming can be traced back to the Roman civilization, which laid the groundwork for these exploitative practices. Proponents of this model, rooted in European colonialism, argue that the rest of the world should adopt these human zoo farms and their rituals as a means of modernization.

State-building and empire-building are key components of the human farming process, sharing a historical and political trajectory focused on acquiring new lands and claiming resources. In this context, colonized subjects are viewed as part of a human zoo, with colonial powers treating them not just as animals but as laborers to be exploited. Historically, colonized individuals were often labeled as slaves or servants, illustrating the dehumanization central to these oppressive systems. Today, this language has shifted, with such individuals now referred to as workers. This change in terminology does not alter the underlying reality; to maintain subjugation, colonizers continue to employ various taming methods. The development of psychology, public schooling, and universities has introduced a new form of psychological warfare aimed at the fake empowerment of those previously labeled as slaves or servants. This method allows individuals to remain in their subordinate positions while being recognized as important participants in society, creating a facade of opportunity and social mobility. These individuals are categorized based on their occupations—such as workers, doctors, teachers, and engineers. However, the underlying reality remains unchanged: throughout their lives, their primary role continues to be that of laborers.

There is no genuine participation in political or economic decision-making processes for these individuals. In this facade of empowerment, elections play a crucial role in misleading people into believing that their votes can change their destinies. The reality is that individuals are subjected to a process of dehumanization-animalisation, manipulated by capitalist colonial powers. Individuals in these conditions often find themselves in a state of hopelessness, working as enslaved beings in human zoo colonies controlled by a minority of slaveholders. Human rights, in this context, are merely illusions designed to provide a facade of protection and empowerment, transforming individuals into law-abiding subjects. In reality, these laws serve to confine individuals within a human farm, marked by borders and boundaries, while the notion of human rights acts as a mechanism of control. Rather than offering true freedom, these rights often perpetuate a system that tames and restricts, ensuring that the dynamics of subjugation remain intact. This global human zoo is maintained by state and corporate regulations, with representative governments performing rituals that reinforce the dynamics of a colonial human farming system.

Representative elections began in British territories not as a means to empower the populace, but rather to maintain control and keep power in the hands of regional lords, and monarchs. By electing individuals to local positions, the monarchy could consolidate its authority at the local level, ensuring that elected officials served the interests of the crown. Furthermore, the establishment of corporate-like regional governments enhanced the profitability of local lords and increased the income of monarchs. As a result, corporate interests and investments became closely intertwined with the agendas of European monarchs and other royal figures worldwide.

European thieves occupied territories such as North America, South America, Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia, French Polynesia, and Tokelau, utilizing the rule of law to rob the land and dispossess indigenous populations and enslave them. They also imported enslaved individuals to bolster the European presence in these regions, ensuring a demographic advantage over the native peoples. In this system, neither immigrants nor indigenous populations hold true control over the political economy or land; these resources remain in the hands of the ruling slaver class and the state. White Europeans have historically occupied land, business, and political power, while indigenous populations and immigrants from Africa and Asia predominantly serve as laborers for these white slavers. Additionally, there are funding mechanisms for indigenous and minority groups that often create deception and dependency among these marginalized communities. The control of financial resources, including money printing, remains firmly in the hands of European occupiers, perpetuating systemic inequalities and maintaining their dominance. European colonizers have historically required a facade to obscure their theft and occupation, employing morally superior narratives to justify their actions. Elections and the discourse surrounding human rights serve as this masking drama, creating an illusion of legitimacy that conceals the ongoing theft and enslavement of occupied territories. These rituals distract from the realities of exploitation and serve to maintain the status quo, allowing colonial powers to present themselves as benevolent while perpetuating systemic injustices.      

In republics where monarchies no longer exist, European colonizers have sought to establish power structures resembling monarchy across the globe. This concentrated power manifests in various forms depending on the country and the context, including presidents, prime ministers, military juntas, theocratic leaders, warlords, and gang leaders. Each of these roles functions to keep power distanced from the populace. Representative government plays a crucial role in maintaining this power structure, often providing a veneer of legitimacy. In some nations, this system fluctuates regularly between civilian representation and military rule, further entrenching the cycle of control and oppression.           

Civilian governments often do not empower the people but rather serve the interests of specific political parties and leaders. In this system, the populace exchanges one form of slavery for another— from military rule to civilian control—thanks to representative elections, parliaments, and party politics. Politicians engage in election spectacles and parliamentary rituals, projecting the illusion that they are distinct from military rulers and genuinely working for the people’s interests. To maintain this facade, they rely on texts such as human rights declarations, which are presented as safeguards for the enslaved populace. However, in practice, these rights primarily benefit lawyers and legal professionals who profit from the issues faced by individuals within this law-abiding, slave-holding framework. Ultimately, while human rights are touted as blessings for those in subjugation, they often serve to perpetuate a system that keeps true power and autonomy out of reach.

Party politics often create the illusion of choice for the populace, presenting various political ideologies to manage the colonial slave market. In reality, a multi-party political system is inherently anti-democratic, as it maintains power structures that distance power from the people rather than empowering them. This system reinforces existing hierarchies and prevents genuine democracy. To achieve meaningful freedom and democracy, it is essential to abolish such a system and establish frameworks that truly prioritize the voices and needs of the populace.  

The term "savages" often reflects a colonial perspective that seeks to maintain a dual narrative of both savagery and enslavement. Understanding the implications of this term is crucial for challenging the narratives of Western civilization and its so-called civilizing missions. 

The characteristics attributed to "savages" typically include:

1. Lack of Awareness: A perceived inability to understand their position within the environment and the broader world.  

2. Violence as Resolution: A tendency to resolve conflicts through violent means rather than dialogue.

3. Low Moral Compass: An assumed low moral compass, where technological advancements or rituals are mistakenly viewed as indicators of civilization, rather than virtues like empathy, kindness, and fairness.

4. Low Reasoning Ability: A perceived deficiency in reasoning and logical capacity, suggesting a dominance of instinctual mammalian behaviors over the more complex reasoning expected of humans.

According to these characteristics, it is the colonial masters who exhibit behaviors typically associated with savagery, highlighting the need for their own "civilization" rather than that of the enslaved subjects. It underscores the importance of recognizing and challenging the true nature of power dynamics, suggesting that the real work of civilizing may lie in addressing the oppressive behaviors of those in power rather than those they seek to subjugate.

The colonial estates that once housed enslaved individuals have now transformed into apartment buildings and condominiums, reflecting a shift from free accommodation to a system where individuals must buy or pay rent for their living spaces. Historically and in contemporary society, cities have been developed primarily to accommodate this enslaved labor force, but unlike animals in a zoo, these individuals are required to pay for their human zoo housing. Moreover, the development of highways and the widespread use of mortgages serve to keep individuals preoccupied, leaving little time for reflection or dissent. This is a deliberate strategy by the ruling slaver social planning class to ensure that the enslaved work tirelessly, often until death, as part of a planned anti-revolutionary framework designed to suppress any potential uprising.

To achieve true democracy and meaningful participation in power—essential for real freedom—there must be a fundamental overhaul of existing systems. Abolishing elections, political parties, and traditional parliamentary structures is crucial, as these institutions often hinder genuine democratic practice. Instead, empowering individuals to engage in decision-making on a daily basis is essential. Grassroots democratic institutions, such as face-to-face community assemblies and neighborhood forums, can replace the current system. These spaces allow people to gather, discuss the issues they face, and collaboratively find solutions, much like a parliament but with direct involvement from the community. Establishing permanent venues for ongoing participation ensures that citizens can engage in governance regularly, while also having the ability to delegate power at national or global levels through confederations. This approach fosters a truly participatory democracy that prioritizes the voices and needs of the people. 

Personal and social issues faced by marginalized individuals often result in unproductive arguments with family members, neighbors, and community members, particularly when those involved feel powerless within existing institutional frameworks. This sense of powerlessness can stifle meaningful dialogue and prevent collective action, leaving individuals frustrated and unable to address the root causes of their challenges. To effect real change, individuals must have a voice in the decision-making processes that impact their lives. This requires participation in institutional power structures that genuinely accommodate social decision-making. Without such participation, decisions are often made by others—typically in their own interests rather than those of the affected individuals. The abolition of slavery and the end of the slave trade will only occur when power is firmly in the hands of the people. Empowered individuals are less likely to be subjugated; they can advocate for their needs and ensure that their interests are prioritized, breaking the cycle of oppression.